Dear RN list, May 26
The evidence is, for some of us, overwhelming: that decisions which plummet
whole societies into desperation and hopelessness are being made in secret
(eg. in meetings such as the Bilderberg event coming up in June) and then
sold in a most deceitful manner to us, the public.
Overwhelming also, the task of figuring out how best to counter this evil.
But maybe even exciting too, for maybe those of us who are reading these
postings can find, in working together, some way to make peace, freedom,
health & justice real...
all the best, Jan
*************************************************************
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 23:55:47 -0400
From: Eric Fawcett <•••@••.•••>
Subject: sfp-82: the New World Order in Iraq and Afghanistan
1] "Iraq is falling apart. We are ruined"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What is now happening in the Balkans was tried first on the Iraqi capital,
a city being driven back into the Dark Ages, writes David Sharrock,
special correspondent with The Guardian, in Baghdad [and before that in
Afghanistan - see item 2 below]
Taking a walk in this benighted city is a lesson in modern warfare. What
is happening in the Balkans was tested first in Iraq. You only need to
take a few steps down any Baghdad street to feel the changes -- feared by
the majority and exploited by the profiteering few -- creeping into every
facet of life.
It is clear that something sinister and irrevocable is under way. Beneath
the outward calm, chaos is bubbling. "Everything you see points to Iraq
falling apart," says a Baghdad veteran. "This country is becoming a Third
World nation." Grubby street children sell bubble gum or beg at traffic
lights and prostitutes walk the major roads; this in a country that has
undergone a religious revival!
"Iraq used to be a secular society with an educated population and a
growing middle class," says a Baghdad professional. "It is simply
impossible to believe what is happening. Tribalism and religion are
asserting their old dominance. Urban society has been ruined, people are
returning to the countryside to find food. We are utterly ruined."
Go and ask the traders on Rashid Street, known as the "thieves' market",
what is going on. Or wait until they ask you to explain the"Anglo-American
plan" for their liberation. You can find most things in this souk, from a
video player to a corkscrew -- everything that would have been commonplace
in an average Baghdad household before the Gulf war. Now no item is too
small for resale if it brings in a few US dollars.
Here I met Karim, a slight figure whose impeccable English betrayed his
British university education -- civil engineering at Birmingham. He was
trying, without conviction, to sell black market cigarettes. "Please, I
would like to ask you a question," he said hesitantly. "You are from
England? It is a country I love. I made many good friends. I found they
were gentle people. I want to know, do they know what is happening to
Iraq? Do they know that our leaders are not getting hurt by the embargo,
that it is only the ordinary people who you are harming?"
Quite simply, the West is conducting a monstrous social experiment on the
people of Iraq. A once-prosperous nation is being driven into the
pre-industrial Dark Ages. It will take years to fathom the harm being
done to the lives of 21.7 million people here by a policy intended,
according to its shapers in Washington and supporters in London, to bring
Iraq back into the international community of nations by toppling Saddam
Hussein. Karim is typical of thousands of members of the Iraqi middle
class. He studied in Britain and returned home to pass on his knowledge.
"My professor begged me to stay, he said I reminded him of [his] own son
and that I could make a better life in England," he says. "But I was
young and idealistic, I wanted to fight to improve my country. I now know
it was the worst mistake of mylife." Karim married and found a job as a
university professor with a salary of around $2,400 a month. That was
plenty on which to raise his four children before the war, when a quasi-
socialist system and vast oil wealth gave Iraqis one of the highest
standards of living in the Middle East. As long as the oil flowed and
you kept your nose clean, the excesses of President Saddam's regime --
the all-enveloping security services and the war with Iran -- could be
managed with little discomfort.
Nobody anticipated that President Saddam would invade Kuwait in August
1990, still less the consequences of his defeat. The West had long been
an ally, arming Iraq for its proxy war with the Shia fundamentalist
regime in Iran. Even in 1988, when sarin and mustard gas were rained on
the Kurds, killing 5,000 in a day at Halabja, Western protests were
muted. By challenging the regional order and threatening the status quo
of the world's oil market, however, he was transformed overnight into
public enemy number one.
United Nations security resolutions demanded that the Iraqi regime
destroy its weapons of mass destruction, but Washington had bolder plans.
Robert Gates, a deputy national security adviser under President George
Bush, said that Iraqis would "pay the price" while President Saddam was
in power. This presupposed that the Iraqi leader cared for his people.
The economic blockade on Iraq was only partially relieved in 1996, when a
UN oil-for-food programme was accepted after the World Health Organisation
reported that most Iraqis had been on a "semi-starvation diet for years".
Within a year of the invasion of Kuwait food prices in Iraq increased by
2,000 per cent. Hyperinflation turned Karim's comfortable salary into the
equivalent of $5 a month and everything was sold, even his wedding ring.
The experience has left him deeply suspicious of the United States and
Britain. "Do they really want to get rid of our friend [the euphemism
Iraqis employ when they talk about their leader] by killing all of us
first? Perhaps they are actually helping to keep him in power?" he says.
The strict rationing has certainly strengthened President Saddam's
control over his people. On the eve of the 1995 referendum which asked,
"Do you agree that Saddam Hussein should be president of Iraq?", security
officers visited the 8 million eligible voters and asked: "Do you know
how to vote?" and "Are you receiving your food rations?" President Saddam
won 99.96 per cent of the vote.
Off Saadoun Street is a pharmacy run by Yussuf Kassab, who should have
retired after a lifetime's work at the ministry of health. He is forced
to work because his sons, one a dentist the other an engineer, cannot
afford to live independently. Many of his clients leave empty-handed,
unable to obtain even such ordinary items as antihistamines and cough
linctus. The situation has improved slightly over the past six months,
but Dr Kassab says: "There is a restricted amount of many of these
products in circulation, so the patients . . . will just keep going round
the city looking. Maybe they will be lucky."
Ominously, a recent UN security council report notes that as of late
January $274 million of supplies and medicine purchased under the oil-for-
food programme had accumulated in government warehouses -- more than half
of the supplies that have arrived in Iraq. Under the programme Iraq is in
charge of distribution, not the UN. "According to information provided by
UN observers, only 15per cent of all medical equipment received by the
warehouses had been distributed," it says.
One officer in the relief field comments: "Two months ago I would have
said point blank that I did not believe that the Iraqi government was
deliberately starving its people or depriving them of essential medicines,
but I'm coming round to the view that, as part of their plan, someone
somewhere is not rushing these things through as much as they might."
Dennis Halliday, an Irish Quaker who was the UN humanitarian co-ordinator,
resigned from his post last summer, bitterly observing that sanctions had
killed a million Iraqis, including 500,000 children. But when this
statistic was put to the US secretary of state, Madeleine Albright, in
1996, when she was US ambassador to the UN, she replied: "I think this is
a very hard choice but the price -- we think the price is worth it."
Today about 5,000 children are dying every month because of the poor
water supplies, an inadequate diet and a lack of health care. Malnutrition
among children under five, having fallen from 32 per cent since the
introduction of the oil-for-food programme, is now stubbornly stuck at 23
per cent.
Pierrette Vu Thi, a planning officer for Unicef, has a different spin on
one of the US military planners' favourite buzzwords -- "degradation".
While advocates of the military option talk about "degrading" President
Saddam's capacity to threaten his neighbours, Ms Vu Thi says that the
real "degradation" is occurring in Iraq's social fabric. Half of the
country's schools are not fit for occupation, 10,000 teachers have given
up their jobs because they cannot survive on the salary of $3.50-$10 a
month, and 30 per cent of children have dropped out of school. "The
oil-for-food programme has not addressed this degradation," she says.
Ms Vu Thi is careful to stop short of Mr Halliday's assessment of the
merits of the sanctions campaign, merely stating "Unicef's great concern".
Crime is rising as Iraq's infrastructure crumbles. Electricity supplies
are running at only 40 per cent of their pre-war levels. Up to $41
billion is needed to restore an adequate supplies of water, electricity,
education and health care.
Meanwhile continuing bombing raids in the "no-fly zones" in the north
and south of Iraq are the heart of the latest phase in the US-British
war on the country. A US assertion that around 200 bombs have been dropped
in "self-defence" on Iraqi military installations since Operation Desert
Fox ended is "far below reality", according to an independent observer.
"The Iraqi claim that 3,200 sorties have been flown by the Americans and
British since Desert Fox is accurate. It is very nearly the same number
as in the whole of the air campaign during the Gulf war. They are fighting
a low-intensity, high-technology, undeclared war."
Another Western source agrees, but doubts whether the Americans and
British are any nearer to removing President Saddam from power. "The
Americans are gaining much more by chipping away every day at his
military infrastructure than with a four-day intensive blitz as in
December," he says. "The air strikes are happening on a daily basis but
are going virtually unreported . . . I don't know if they have a
strategy, it just looks like lashing out."
The Iraqi people usually know what is going on, thanks to the Voice of
America, the BBC World Service and the bush telegraph. They have just
been told that the US is not at war with Iraq but rather, in the surreal
phrase of Thomas Pickering, the US undersecretary of state for political
affairs, in a "state of animosity" with Baghdad. Intriguingly Mr Pickering
also told a US senate hearing that the UN oil-for-food programme was a
linchpin for Washington's efforts to maintain sanctions.
And according to the British junior foreign office minister Tony Lloyd,
the UK government "has decided to launch a new policy of better-targeted,
'smarter sanctions', which will ensure that "the people who are hit are
the ones who should be hit". "Ah, your Mr Robin Cook," said Karim,
catching sight of the foreign secretary on an Iraqi news programme.
"He said he was going to give Britain an ethical foreign policy, didn't
he? Can you ask him for me, what is there ethical about what he is doing
to me or all the other ordinary Iraqis?"
At the Saddam Hospital for Children there is ample opportunity to study
the consequences of this ethical foreign policy. Ayat Abbad is a year old
yet weighs a little more than 3kg, half her ideal weight. Like thousands
of other babies she is suffering from marasmus, a type of malnutrition
that was unheard of in Iraq before the Gulf war and the sanctions, and
has suffered gastroenteritis and pneumonia The duty doctor holds out
little hope for her survival. "She will either die before the end of the
year or she will live and grow up stunted and with low intelligence," he
says. "It is not just the lack of medicines, they have created an entire
culture of embargo . . . we are not receiving new-generation drugs,
advances in medicine, science, food, anything."
Besieged by US and British policy and by a government that treats its
people as bargaining chips, the real casualties of this war are those who
can least afford to pay the price or raise their voices to be heard.
What poses the greater danger to the West's "vital regional interests" in
the future: the survival of Presidents Saddam or a generation of Iraqis
made bitter by the indifference of Western countries running daily raids
in "self-defence"?
The Guardian Weekly Volume 160 Issue 18 for week ending May 2, 1999, P11
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2] The Afghan Trap: Interview with Brezinski
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76,
translation Bill Blum
Q: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs, From
the Shadows, that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen
in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you
were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played
a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to
the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army
invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until
now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President
Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the
pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the
president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going
to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Q: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But
perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke
it?
B: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we
knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Q: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they
[entendaient] to fight against a secret [ingérence] of the United States in
Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of
truth. You don't regret anything today?
B: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the
effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret
it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to
President Carter: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its
Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war
unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the
demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Q: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic [intégrisme],
having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
B: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the
collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of
Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Q: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic
fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
B: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to
Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a
rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading
religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in
common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan
militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more
than what unites the Christian countries.
Richard Moore notes [with my additional comments]
1) The intentional setting of traps to achieve desired outcomes.
[consider the parallels in Iraq and Yugoslavia]
2) The explicit lack of concern regarding the pawns in the game, in
particular, the lack of regret about the Taliban outcome.
[the Kurds, Iraqi people, Serbs, Kosovars....]
3) The admission that actual plans and goals, involving top levels
of government, are routinely kept secret for years - covered over by PR lies.
For nearly 20 years, B. tells us, a major conspiracy was successfully kept
secret from the American people and the world. There were changes of
administration, and changes of personnel in the various agencies invovled,
and yet nothing leaked out of the mainstream media. People at the highest
level of government were in the know, along with who-knows-how-many field
agents, support personnel, administrative staff, media insiders, etc. etc.
There is an "official version of history" and then there is reality - the
discrepancy is called "conspiracy" - and by some means or the other, such
conspiracies can be kept secret successfully for decades. The Afghan Trap
is only one of many that have come to light and been well documented, if
not admitted outright as in this case.
**********************************************************
Note from Jan: For those of you who are concerned about the allegations that
medicines and supplies are not being distributed properly by the Iraqi
government, the excerpt from the Voices in the Wilderness message below,
which Richard sent to the cj list, is pertinent. (It is not impossible that
the Iraqi goverment lacks zeal in getting what few supplies are allowed past
the sanctions to the people. But this is no reason for us to forget our own
responsibility in this crime.)
Subject: cj#949> VItW: Meanwhile, crimes continue in Iraq...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 15:53:06 -0600
From: Voices In the Wilderness <•••@••.•••>
Dear Friends,
<snip>
Upon return from Iraq, we learned about reports accusing the Iraqi
government of deliberately withholding medicines, stashing them in
warehouses rather than delivering them to needy people. Puzzled, we asked
our delegation that's presently in Iraq, the Boston delegation, (March 15 -
28 1999), to doublecheck with UN authorities in Baghdad regarding these
allegations. On March 18, Jennifer Horan, of the Boston delegation, called
to say that she spoke with Dr. Habib Rejeb, MD of the World Health
Organization, in his UN office in Baghdad, and that he urged nations not to
throw stones at Iraq because it has problems distributing medicines. He
detailed the litany of difficulties facing Iraqi workers responsible for
food and medicine distribution. The Boston delegation will supply us with a
full report, upon return. You may recall excerpts from a VitW November '98
interview with Dr. Rejeb in which he explained that Resolution 986, the oil
for food deal, doesn't allow for any cash to purchase equipment needed to
distribute relief shipments or to hire Iraqi relief workers. Many of you
will have already heard Denis Halliday and Phyllis Bennis further describe
the flaws in implementing current UN Resolutions.
<snip>
Denis Halliday and Phyllis Bennis, nearing the end of their cross country
tour, were enthused by the assortment of tenacious, creative groups they'd
met, all dedicated to ending the sanctions against Iraq. Impressed by this
compassionate network, they suggested that we change our name to "Voices,"
since we're no longer facing a wilderness. We're encouraged. Yet we still
long for a time when Iraqi childrenís voices will reach us with exuberant
laughter, energy and joy, unclouded by anguished affliction. Till then, we
remain your companions in a determined struggle.
Sincerely,
Kathy Kelly
for Voices in the Wilderness
Voices in the Wilderness
A Campaign to End the US/UN Economic Sanctions Against the People of Iraq
1460 West Carmen Ave.
Chicago, IL 60640
ph:773-784-8065; fax: 773-784-8837
email: •••@••.•••
website: http://www.nonviolence.org/vitw
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
========================================================================
To subscribe to the cyberjournal,
send any message to •••@••.•••
A public service of Citizens for a Democratic Renaissance
(mailto:•••@••.••• http://cyberjournal.org)
**--> Non-commercial reposting is encouraged,
but please include the sig up through this paragraph
and retain any internal credits and copyright notices.
Copyrighted materials are posted under "fair-use".
To see the index of the cj archives, send any message to:
•••@••.•••
To subscribe to our activists list, send any message to:
•••@••.•••
Help create the Movement for a Democratic Rensaissance!
A community will evolve only when
the people control their means of communication.
-- Frantz Fanon
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful
committed citizens can change the world,
indeed it's the only thing that ever has.
- Margaret Mead
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: •••@••.•••
For additional commands, e-mail: •••@••.•••
