-------------------------------------------------------- From: JFadiman Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 11:02:13 EST Subject: Fwd: [THS] Chris Floyd: Vision Quest To: •••@••.••• if you look at it this way, it all makes ugly realistic sense. ---<fwd>--- To: •••@••.••• From: peter webster <•••@••.•••> Subject: [THS] Chris Floyd: Vision Quest Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 15:34:19 +0200 http://informationclearinghouse.info/article12582.htm http://context.themoscowtimes.com/story/167012/ (w/live links to sources) Vision Quest By Chris Floyd 03/31/06 "Moscow Times" -- -- Once again we must take up the cudgels for President George W. Bush, who is being increasingly maligned for his alleged lack of strategic vision in Iraq. This chorus of petty carping from partisan dead-enders has been exacerbated of late by all the hand-wringing media reports about "civil war" breaking out among the ungrateful beneficiaries of the president's selfless crusade for peace and enlightenment in the Middle East. These charges are, as always, pure bunkum. As we have often noted here before, Bush is pursuing a remarkably effective "win-win" strategy in Iraq, a highly flexible vision that is even now ripening to fruition. The savage militias, ethnic cleansing, mass murder, sectarian hatred and gruesome tortures that are turning Iraq into a howling moonscape of fear and chaos are but precision tools in the artful hands of the Leader, as he patiently crafts the ultimate victory. The war aims of the Babylonian Conquest have always been obvious to anyone who concentrates on the operational reality of the action, ignoring the ludicrous cornball about democracy and security that Bush dishes out to gull the rubes back home. The reality clearly shows that Bush had three primary objectives in launching the invasion. First and foremost was the transfer of large portions of the national wealth of Iraq -- and the United States -- into the coffers of his political cronies, corporate backers and family members. Second was the frantic acceleration of the long-running, bipartisan militarization of America, which is now almost wholly dependent on war and rumors of war to keep its heavily mortgaged economy afloat. Third was planting a permanent military presence in Iraq to "project dominance" over the strategic oil lands and serve as staging areas for further operations in regime change and political extortion as needed. ("Nice little country you got there, Abdul; too bad if something, like, happened to it -- you savvy? Now howzabout signing that free trade agreement already?") None of these aims have been harmed in the slightest by Iraq's death spiral into civil war. The Bush faction's war profiteering and fraud -- on a scale surpassing anything ever seen in world history -- has fueled a ruthless political machine that, despite its growing unpopularity with the U.S. people, now controls all three branches of government and has overthrown the Constitution, openly declaring that its leader is beyond the reach of "judicial review, congressional oversight or international law," as The Washington Post reported, rather belatedly, this week. Swollen by the swag of aggressive war, the elite interests represented by the Bush regime -- oil, military-related industries and predatory venture capitalists like the Carlyle Group -- have had their already inordinate sway over American society and policy increased by several magnitudes. They will remain ascendant for decades to come, no matter what happens in Iraq, or in any U.S. election. Indeed, the murderous chaos that will inevitably spill across the region, and the world, from the collapse of Iraq will only mean more boffo box office for the fearmongers and warmongers of the Bush faction -- and even greater feasting for their oil barons, already gorged on record-breaking profits after just three years of bloodshed. The whack-a-mole "Long War" gleefully envisioned by the Pentagon will thus be extended indefinitely, bringing more militarization, more draconian "war powers," and further destruction of those pesky civil rights and constitutional liberties that hinder the elites in their exercise of raw power. Civil war also enhances the prospect of permanent U.S. bases. The Sunni minority, once the most vociferous opponents of American occupation, now look -- vainly -- to U.S. forces as their last-ditch protection against the deadly militias of the Shiite majority. The Shiite-led government relies on U.S. military might to prop up its rickety state system. The Kurds (who are busy ethnically cleansing their own enclave, as The Washington Post reports, and imprisoning people for criticizing the corruption of Kurdish leaders, as The New York Times reports) are happy for the Americans to plant vast, minatory fortresses down south to keep the troublesome Arabs in line. And so the permanent bases are being sunk deep into Iraqi soil; the Pentagon has already "authorized or proposed almost $1 billion" for bases in 2005-06, The Associated Press reports. And if Iraq cracks apart completely -- the "three-state solution" proposed by Leslie Gelb, doyen of that bastion of bipartisan Establishment wisdom, the Council on Foreign Relations -- why, so much the better. It will be much easier to wangle basing agreements, oil deals, insider investments and those all-important arms contracts out of weakened mini-states struggling for survival than from a strong, unified nation looking out for its own interests. As the gates of hell blow open in Iraq, the marvelous adaptability of Bush's strategy becomes apparent. When the promised "cakewalk" did not materialize, Bush shifted to the near-genocidal fury of the Fallujah assault and the systematic tortures of Abu Ghraib. When these tactics failed to quell the resistance, Bush gave the Pentagon the greenlight to arm, infiltrate and manipulate militias and terrorist groups, even to the point of goading them into action, The New Yorker reports. If you can't have cake, then chaos might serve your turn just as well. Civil war looks like a profitable gambit for now -- except for all the pointless suffering, of course. But Bush has never cared about that. A true visionary, he keeps his eyes on the prize, on the only kind of "victory" he has ever sought in Iraq: loot and domination for his ruthless clique. Whatever happens next, they've already won. Annotations 'If You Start Looking at Them as Humans, How Are You Gonna Kill Them?' The Guardian, 29 March, 2006 Fear Up Harsh: The Iraqi Civil War in Context Empire Burlesque, March 28, 2006 Opening Statement of Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz House Armed Services Committee, Aug. 10, 2004 Testimony on Denying Terrorist Sanctuaries: Wolfowitz, Pace, Brown U.S. Department of Defense, Aug. 10, 2004 Pentagon granted authority to pay, equip foreign forces Los Angeles Times, Oct. 30, 2004 Seymour Hersh: The Coming Wars The New Yorker, Jan. 17, 2005 The Salvador Option Newsweek, Jan. 14, 2005 Leslie Gelb: The Three-State Solution New York Times, Nov. 25, 2003 Children of Abraham: Death in the Desert Empire Burlesque, March 19/27, 2006 Redirecting Bullets in Baghdad New York Times, March 26, 2006 Bound, Blindfolded and Dead: The Face of Atrocity in Baghdad New York Times, March 25, 2006 Court Case Challenges Power of President Washington Post, March 26, 2006 Civil War? What Civil War? Salon.com, March 23, 2006 A Government with No Military and No Territory TomDispatch.com, March 9, 2006 The Battle for Baghdad 'Has Already Started' The Independent, March 25, 2006 30 Beheaded Bodies Found; Iraqi Death Squads Blamed New York Times, March 27, 2006 Extended presence of U.S. in Iraq looms large Associated Press, March 21, 2006 The Supplemental Pentagon Spending Bill: Eternal Funding for a Never-Ending War CounterPunch, March 27, 2006 Bush Was Set on Path to War, Memo to British Adviser Says New York Times, March 27, 2006 Kurdish Officials Sanction Abductions in Kirkuk Washington Post, June 15, 2005 US audit finds 'spectacular' waste of funds in Iraq Christian Science Monitor, Jan. 27, 2006 Free Press Stumbles in Kurdistan Los Angeles Times, March 27, 2006 Death squads operated from inside Iraqi government, officials say Knight-Ridder, March 12, 2006 What Bush was Told About Iraq National Journal, March 2, 2006 Iraq's death squads: On the brink of civil war The Independent, Feb. 26, 2006 Cry Havoc: Bush's Own Personal Janjaweed Empire Burlesque, Aug. 27, 2004 Darkness Visible: The Pentagon Plan to Foment Terrorism is Now in Operation Empire Burlesque, Jan. 25, 2005 Into the Dark: The Pentagon Plan to Foment Terrorism Empire Burlesque, Nov. 1, 2002 Requests for Iraqi Base Funding Make Some Wary of Extended Stay Los Angeles Times, March 24, 2006 Abizaid says U.S. may want to keep bases in Iraq Reuters, March 15, 2006 Hillary Clinton, War Goddess Antiwar.com, Jan. 23, 2006 Cost of Rebuilding Shifts to Iraqis USA Today, March 24, 2006 US Has "Black" Torture Chamber in Iraq Deep Blade Journal, March 19, 2006 U.S. Plans New Bases in the Middle East Washington Post, March 22, 2006 How Abu Ghraib Lives On Time, March 6, 2006 Ring of Fire: The Fallujah Inferno Empire Burlesque, Nov. 19, 2004 CIA Vet: Proof Bush Deceived America on War TomPaine.com, Jan. 13, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Moscow Times. All rights reserved -- -------------------------------------------------------- Escaping the Matrix website http://escapingthematrix.org/ cyberjournal website http://cyberjournal.org blog: cyberjournal forum http://cyberjournal-rkm.blogspot.com/ blog: Achieving real democracy http://harmonization.blogspot.com/ blog: for readers of ETM http://matrixreaders.blogspot.com/ blog: Community Empowerment http://empowermentinitiatives.blogspot.com/ Blogger made easy http://quaylargo.com/help/ezblogger.html subscribe cyberjournal list mailto:•••@••.••• Posting archives http://cyberjournal.org/show_archives/?lists=newslog
